PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .293vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 23%Slider 16%Cutter 9%SV 9%Sinker 8%Sweeper 3%Curveball 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 1 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MS Myles Straw RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.