PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .283Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 24%Slider 13%Cutter 10%Sinker 9%SV 9%Sweeper 4%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 HB Henry Bolte RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .422 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MM Max Muncy RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.