PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 23%Slider 13%Cutter 10%SV 9%Sinker 8%Sweeper 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.