PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .292vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 23%Slider 16%SV 9%Cutter 9%Sinker 8%Sweeper 3%Curveball 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .226 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.