PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .288vs RHH xwOBA .336Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Changeup 22%Slider 19%SV 10%Sinker 9%Cutter 8%Curveball 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.