PITCHER MATCHUP

Patrick Corbin vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Patrick Corbin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Patrick Corbin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 30%Cutter 21%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 6%Curveball 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Patrick Corbin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC José Caballero RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jasson Domínguez SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jasson Domínguez
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.