PITCHER MATCHUP

Patrick Corbin vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Patrick Corbin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Patrick Corbin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 30%Cutter 21%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 6%Curveball 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Patrick Corbin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 572 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 506 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AJ Aaron Judge RHB .381
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Aaron Judge
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .460 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .426 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .424 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.