PITCHER MATCHUP

Patrick Corbin vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Patrick Corbin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Patrick Corbin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .350Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 30%Cutter 22%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 5%Curveball 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Patrick Corbin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Ben Rice LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AR Amed Rosario RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JE J.C. Escarra LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.C. Escarra
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Anthony Volpe RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Anthony Volpe
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.