PITCHER MATCHUP

Patrick Corbin vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Patrick Corbin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Patrick Corbin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 30%Cutter 21%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 6%Curveball 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Patrick Corbin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.