PITCHER MATCHUP

Patrick Corbin vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Patrick Corbin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Patrick Corbin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 30%Cutter 21%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 6%Curveball 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Patrick Corbin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 602 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.