PITCHER MATCHUP

Patrick Corbin vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Patrick Corbin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Patrick Corbin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .352Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 31%Sinker 30%Cutter 21%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 5%Curveball 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Patrick Corbin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 560 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JJ Josh Jung RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Burger RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KH Kyle Higashioka RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Higashioka
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-26 game page →