PITCHER MATCHUP

Patrick Corbin vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Patrick Corbin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Patrick Corbin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 32%Sinker 30%Cutter 21%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 6%Curveball 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Patrick Corbin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 657 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JP Joc Pederson LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 CS Corey Seager LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .274
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.