PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Schultz vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Schultz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Schultz's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .367vs RHH xwOBA .366Seasons 2026
Sinker 26%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sweeper 21%Cutter 21%Changeup 10%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Schultz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC José Caballero RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.