PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Schultz vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Schultz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Schultz's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .386vs RHH xwOBA .368Seasons 2026
Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 24%Sweeper 22%Cutter 20%Changeup 10%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Schultz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC José Caballero RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JD Jasson Domínguez SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jasson Domínguez
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-27 game page →