PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Schultz vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Schultz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Schultz's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .333vs RHH xwOBA .364Seasons 2026
Sinker 26%Cutter 22%Sweeper 22%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Changeup 9%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Schultz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.