PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Schultz vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Schultz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Schultz's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .343vs RHH xwOBA .364Seasons 2026
Sinker 26%Cutter 22%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Sweeper 21%Changeup 9%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Schultz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Colton Cowser LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Carlos Narváez RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Narváez
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CE Christian Encarnacion-Strand RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Encarnacion-Strand
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.