PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Schultz vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Schultz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Schultz's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .367vs RHH xwOBA .366Seasons 2026
Sinker 26%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sweeper 21%Cutter 21%Changeup 10%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Schultz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Colton Cowser LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TO Tyler O'Neill RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler O'Neill
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JH Jackson Holliday LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Holliday
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.