PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Schultz vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Schultz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Schultz's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .367vs RHH xwOBA .354Seasons 2026
Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Cutter 21%Sweeper 21%Changeup 10%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Schultz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 486 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 593 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AM Angel Martínez SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.