PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 12%Sinker 2%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VC Victor Caratini SH .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TG Tristan Gray LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Gray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-30 game page →