PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 12%Sinker 2%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CK Colt Keith LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 492 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.