PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Cutter 21%Changeup 19%Curveball 17%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.