PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Boston Red Sox

How the Boston Red Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Boston Red Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Boston Red Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 WA Wilyer Abreu LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wilyer Abreu
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JD Jarren Duran LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jarren Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 637 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CD Caleb Durbin RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Caleb Durbin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Adley Rutschman SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AM Andruw Monasterio RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andruw Monasterio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Trevor Story RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Story
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 CW Connor Wong RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Wong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 EW Eli White RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eli White
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NS Nick Sogard SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Sogard
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-13 game page →