PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .342vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NF Nick Fortes RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .272
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BW Ben Williamson RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Williamson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-24 game page →