PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JC Junior Caminero RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .266
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RP Richie Palacios LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.