PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Cutter 21%Changeup 19%Curveball 17%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BS Bryson Stott LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.