PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 12%Sinker 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 669 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .419 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.