PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 12%Sinker 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-06 game page →