PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .342vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 12%Sinker 2%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 TW Taylor Ward RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LT Leody Taveras SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AR Adley Rutschman SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Coby Mayo RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BA Blaze Alexander RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blaze Alexander
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-11 game page →