PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 2%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 541 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JH Jackson Holliday LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Holliday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TO Tyler O'Neill RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler O'Neill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.