PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Cutter 21%Changeup 19%Curveball 17%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.