PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Cutter 21%Changeup 19%Curveball 17%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 672 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.