PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 632 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AF Alex Freeland SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WS Will Smith RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.