PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .333vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 12%Sinker 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.