PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 630 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-07 game page →