PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 1%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 AB Alec Burleson LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW Jordan Walker RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JF José Fermín RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BT Bryan Torres LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-18 game page →