PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .340vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 12%Sinker 2%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 AB Alec Burleson LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW Jordan Walker RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IH Iván Herrera RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.