PITCHER MATCHUP

Noah Cameron vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Noah Cameron's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Noah Cameron's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 21%Changeup 20%Curveball 18%Slider 13%Sinker 2%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Noah Cameron, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MS Myles Straw RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-27 game page →