PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Lodolo vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Lodolo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Lodolo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Curveball 27%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sinker 25%Changeup 22%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Lodolo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 601 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →