PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Lodolo vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Lodolo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Lodolo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Curveball 27%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sinker 25%Changeup 21%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Lodolo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .371
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.