PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Lodolo vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Lodolo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Lodolo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Curveball 27%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sinker 25%Changeup 21%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Lodolo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 635 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .367
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.