PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Lodolo vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Lodolo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Lodolo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Curveball 27%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sinker 25%Changeup 21%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Lodolo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 577 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.