PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Lodolo vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Lodolo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Lodolo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Curveball 27%Sinker 25%Changeup 21%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Lodolo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CY Christian Yelich LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DH David Hamilton LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.