PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Lodolo vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Lodolo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Lodolo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Curveball 28%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sinker 24%Changeup 21%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Lodolo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 WC William Contreras RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BT Brice Turang LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DH David Hamilton LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CY Christian Yelich LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jackson Chourio RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-23 game page →