PITCHER MATCHUP

Miles Mikolas vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Miles Mikolas's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Miles Mikolas's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .346Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Slider 23%Sinker 21%Curveball 16%Changeup 10%Sweeper 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Miles Mikolas, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 587 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 531 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.