PITCHER MATCHUP

Miles Mikolas vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Miles Mikolas's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Miles Mikolas's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .346Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Slider 23%Sinker 21%Curveball 16%Changeup 10%Sweeper 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Miles Mikolas, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.