PITCHER MATCHUP

Mike Burrows vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mike Burrows's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mike Burrows's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Changeup 26%Slider 18%Curveball 13%Sinker 10%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mike Burrows, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .302
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 469 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BH Brady House RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.