PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 485 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JC José Caballero RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JD Jasson Domínguez SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jasson Domínguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-03 game page →