PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 18%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .419 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AW Austin Wells LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SJ Spencer Jones LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Jones
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AJ Aaron Judge RHB .403
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Aaron Judge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .440 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .492 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .438 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.