PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 575 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AJ Aaron Judge RHB .403
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Aaron Judge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .442 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .492 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .437 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.