PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 17%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 485 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-13 game page →