PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 18%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BB Byron Buxton RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.