PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VC Victor Caratini SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TG Tristan Gray LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Gray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.