PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Kansas City Royals

How the Kansas City Royals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 17%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Kansas City Royals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Kansas City Royals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 SP Salvador Perez RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Salvador Perez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BW Bobby Witt Jr. RHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bobby Witt Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CJ Carter Jensen LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carter Jensen
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jac Caglianone LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jac Caglianone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 IC Isaac Collins SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Isaac Collins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 VP Vinnie Pasquantino LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vinnie Pasquantino
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 581 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Michael Massey LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Massey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nick Loftin RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Loftin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KI Kyle Isbel LHB .274
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Isbel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.