PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.