PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 18%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .421 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .209 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JH Jackson Holliday LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Holliday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.