PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .369vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 543 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .223 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JH Jackson Holliday LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Holliday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TO Tyler O'Neill RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler O'Neill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →