PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .230 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Owen Caissie LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JM Joe Mack LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.