PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 18%Changeup 17%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .225 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.