PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .367vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 17%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 616 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-07 game page →