PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .369vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-01 game page →