PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 18%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 642 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.