PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.