PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 646 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 600 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .227 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.