PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .382vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 20%Changeup 16%Sweeper 15%Curveball 11%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .370
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-25 game page →