PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 18%Changeup 17%Sweeper 13%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.