PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .372vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .230 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.