PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .378vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JC Jackson Chourio RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CY Christian Yelich LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-06 game page →