PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .370vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 18%Changeup 17%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 671 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .225 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.