PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DV Daulton Varsho LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daulton Varsho
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GS George Springer RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MS Myles Straw RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-02 game page →