PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .369vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.