PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael McGreevy vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael McGreevy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael McGreevy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .377vs RHH xwOBA .299Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Sinker 19%Changeup 16%Sweeper 14%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael McGreevy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .221 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-22 game page →