PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael Lorenzen vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael Lorenzen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael Lorenzen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .355vs RHH xwOBA .338Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 21%Sinker 19%Changeup 19%Cutter 12%Curveball 11%Slider 10%Sweeper 8%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael Lorenzen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 600 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 595 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.