PITCHER MATCHUP

Michael Lorenzen vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Michael Lorenzen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Michael Lorenzen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .355vs RHH xwOBA .338Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 21%Sinker 19%Changeup 19%Cutter 12%Curveball 11%Slider 10%Sweeper 8%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Michael Lorenzen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 590 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 486 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TE Tommy Edman SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.