PITCHER MATCHUP

Max Meyer vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Max Meyer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Max Meyer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .336Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 31%Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sweeper 20%Changeup 14%Sinker 11%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Max Meyer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 556 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 607 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-20 game page →