PITCHER MATCHUP

Max Meyer vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Max Meyer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Max Meyer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 30%Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sweeper 22%Changeup 13%Sinker 10%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Max Meyer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.