PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Liberatore vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Liberatore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Liberatore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .348Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Slider 24%Curveball 16%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%Cutter 7%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Liberatore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.