PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Liberatore vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Liberatore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Liberatore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .346Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Slider 24%Curveball 16%Changeup 12%Sinker 10%Cutter 7%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Liberatore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JH Jackson Holliday LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Holliday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.