PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Liberatore vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Liberatore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Liberatore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .345Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 23%Curveball 15%Changeup 13%Sinker 11%Cutter 8%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Liberatore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 595 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.