PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Liberatore vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Liberatore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Liberatore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .348Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Slider 24%Curveball 16%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%Cutter 7%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Liberatore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 646 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 600 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.