PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Liberatore vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Liberatore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Liberatore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .355Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 22%Curveball 15%Changeup 13%Sinker 12%Cutter 8%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Liberatore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .368
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-24 game page →