PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Liberatore vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Liberatore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Liberatore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .319vs RHH xwOBA .349Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 23%Curveball 15%Changeup 13%Sinker 11%Cutter 8%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Liberatore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-21 game page →