PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Liberatore vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Liberatore's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Liberatore's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .345Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 24%Curveball 16%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%Cutter 7%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Liberatore, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.