PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Boyd vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Boyd's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Boyd's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .287vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Changeup 25%Slider 15%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Boyd, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-03 game page →