PITCHER MATCHUP

Matthew Boyd vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Matthew Boyd's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Matthew Boyd's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Changeup 25%Slider 15%Curveball 12%Sinker 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Matthew Boyd, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →