PITCHER MATCHUP

Mason Fluharty vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mason Fluharty's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mason Fluharty's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .225vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 53%Sweeper 39%Changeup 7%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mason Fluharty, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Cutter (53% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (39% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.